|
|
|
When did you start
to have the French Eighteenth century passion?
My interest in eighteenth-century France was first piqued in graduate school
at Yale, where I began studying the writings of the philosophes. These
authors remain some of my favorite writers, and I teach them frequently in
my courses. I also have a personal interest in eighteenth-century France, as
my mother's family is French and left France during the Revolution. Someday
I'd like to do a book on that side of my family - the de Courcelles - to learn
more about both what they did while in France, and how they made their way
to America.
When did you
decide to write a book about "Marie Antoinette's style"?
I first became interested in Marie Antoinette's fashions while I was
researching my book on political speeches during the Reign of Terror. It
surprised me to notice how frequently orators, journalists, and political
pamphleteers made reference to the Queen's fashions - to her clothing and
hairstyles - and I started to wonder what political significance her style
might have.
By readind your
book it seems that fashion had much more political meaning
during Marie-Antoinette's time than it does today in our society, where
everything can be extravagant and misunderstood. What do you think about it?
Are
you agree with this assertion?
I do agree that fashion was much more politicized during Marie Antoinette's
time than during our own. Journalists today ask me frequently who "the
twenty-first century Marie Antoinette" might be, but my answer is always
that there is no twenty-first century Marie Antoinette, and that this is
precisely because of the fact that clothes have lost the intensely codified
and politically loaded meanings they bore during the ancien regime and the
Revolution. As I point out in my book's conclusion, the late
eighteenth-century was a time when - in the words of Horace de
Viel-Castel - one could be executed for "crimes of lese-costume." This is
obviously not the case today, and for that reason, the enormously
controversial and politically charged nature of Marie Antoinette's fashion
statements could not be duplicated now.
Do you think Marie
Antoinette was aware of her fashion influence or do you
think she was unable to comprehend the public perception of her eccentricity?
I don't think these two questions are mutually exclusive, as Marie
Antoinette was clearly aware of her fashion influence - I mention in the book
how she actively encouraged her "ministers of fashion" to cultivate a
broader audience for the styles she herself made desirable - but at the same
time she did not seem to understand how her status as a fashion icon wound
up undermining her credibility as a royal wife. The problem, of course, was
that before Marie Antoinette, it was the king's mistress, and not his wife,
who was traditionally known - and reviled - for her excesses of fashion. Marie
Antoinette got herself into trouble with her public by combining the two
roles, and she never appears to have grasped that the people would not
accept her as both a queen and a fashion-plate at the same time.
Marie Antoinette's
life seems to be full of colors and lights, but during the
most important events she wore simple white dresses: white was the
criticized
muslin gaulle that she wore in her Trianon and white was the dress she chose
to
go with to the guillotine. From your point of view did she make such choises
intentionally?
Yes, I feel that she made these choices intentionally. As I mention in my
book, white was a particularly important color for her to wear to her
execution because, by the fall of 1793, it was very much a forbidden color
in revolutionary Paris. Contemporary reports confirm that people who dared
to wear white, which evoked the Bourbon fleur-de-lys and thus royalist
fervor, were publicly attacked in the streets and sometimes even executed
for their visible disloyalty to the revolutionary cause. In choosing a white
dress to wear to her own execution, Marie Antoinette reminded the public
that she had not abandoned her own belief in the monarchy - even at the
moment of her death.
Among several
pictures on your book, there is a sketch kept in the
Bibliothèque Nationale de France that represents a shoe worn by Marie
Antoinette
in 1792: the queen's clothes disappeared right after the Revolution, so did
you
find any difficult to base your own research on engravings, prints,
portraits
and drawings from that period of time?
The absence of material objects - Marie Antoinette's actual dresses and
bonnets, all of which were destroyed - certainly posed a challenge to me as I
researched and wrote this book. The good news, however, is that her clothing
choices were monitored and chronicled with obsessive scrutiny by many, many
people; the visual and textual records of her (ostensible) fashion
statements thus constituted an extremely rich trove from which to draw the
materials I needed to tell this story in a convincing and historically
accurate way.
|
Leggi l'intervista nella traduzione italiana
|
 |

|
|
Queen of Fashion: What Marie-Antoinette Wore to the Revolution
by Caroline Weber
Hardcover/432 pages
New York,
Henri Holt
2006
|
|

Photo by Sarah Shatz |
Caroline
Weber received her Ph.D. in French literature from Yale University (1998)
and her BA in Literature from Harvard University (1991). Before coming to
Barnard/Columbia, she taught for seven years at the University of
Pennsylvania. A specialist in eighteenth-century French literature and
culture, with particular emphasis on the Enlightenment and the French
Revolution, she is the author of Terror and its Discontents: Suspect
Words and the French Revolution (University of Minnesota Press, 2003),
and the co-editor of a special issue of Yale French Studies, Fragments of
Revolution (Yale University Press, 2001). She has published articles on
eighteenth-century authors such as Rousseau, Voltaire, Diderot, Sade,
Charrière, and La Chaussée, and on contemporary thinkers like Lacan and
Lyotard. Currently she is at work on two new book projects: the forthcoming
Queen of Fashion: What Marie-Antoinette Wore to the French Revolution
(Henry Holt, 2006), and a study of ideology and the drame bourgeois.
Additional research and teaching interests include eighteenth-century
fiction and philosophy; psychoanalysis and critical theory; and gender
studies. |
(Notes
from the official website of Columbia University)
|
|
|